What you will Find Inside

 Vitamin Workshop concepts in a Nutshell

Critically IMPORTANT

Your vitamin supplement choices either may lead to vitamin benefits or abuse. Your chances of the ladder are 95%. Yes, you read that right. There is less than a 5% chance of picking a healthy choice multi-vitamin. 

Use SEARCH website on top of left side Navigation Bar to find topics of interest As pages are updated, the links in the search links for the old article remains and says not found.  Look further down list for similar or same titles for new reworks.

Check out What's New for the latest health vitamin connections.

FYI: A number of references have added pop ups blocking pages for cookie policies. Find other references. 

Vitamin Cautions Explained

Precautions exist for Folic Acid, Selenium, Beta Carotene, Vitamins A, B1, B6, B12, C, D, & E. Why there are so many DESIGN FLAWS in multi-vitamin formulas may be a mystery to some, but after discovering the new vitamin reality presented on this website, the mystery will disappear. 

Have you heard this before?

New large study research found an association between higher vitamin B6 (>35mg) and B12 (>20 mcg) intakes with 50% increased risk of hip fractures. article The reason is unknown!

FUN FACTS

Plants and trees take in CO2 from the atmosphere to help growth. As CO2 levels increase from the burning of fossil fuels, volcano eruptions, and melting permafrost, plants and trees have been busy growing faster and larger. In fact this fun fact has lead to the re-greening of many non plant areas of the planet. NASA over the last decade has been measuring this effect from satellites in space taking pictures. article

So far, this re-greening has impacted an area twice the size of the continental United States with new plant and tree coverage. This will significantly slow down any climate changes as this new green area growth will absorb quite a lot of future CO2 emissions. This gives Nations more time to make and implement non CO2 energy changes. 

« Do Vitamin Supplements increase Mortality? | Main | A Final Test of Analytical Skill »
Wednesday
Oct292014

Why Do Scientists Set Up Vitamin Studies to Fail

Imagine a study using contradictory nutrients hoping to find a beneficial value for one of them. Below is copy from just such a study abstract. ref

"Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun 17. [Epub ahead of print]
No effect of n-3 (Omega 3) fatty acids on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after myocardial infarction: The Alpha Omega Trial.
Hoogeveen EK, Geleijnse JM, Kromhout D, Giltay EJ.
Source
Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Persistent inflammation plays a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. n-3 Fatty acids may have anti-inflammatory effects. This study examined the effect of plant-derived alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and marine n-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), a systemic marker of (low-grade) inflammation.

DESIGN/METHODS:
A supplementary study in the Alpha Omega Trial: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose n-3 fatty acids. Patients were enrolled from 2002 to 2006 and followed for 40 months. A total of 2425 patients, aged 60-80 years (79% men), with a history of myocardial infarction, were randomly assigned to margarines supplemented with a targeted additional intake of 400 mg/day EPA and DHA, 2 g/day ALA, EPA-DHA plus ALA, or placebo for 40 months.

RESULTS:
Patients consumed on average 19.8 g margarine/day, providing an additional amount of 238 mg/day EPA with 158 mg/day DHA, 1.98 g/day ALA, or both, in the active treatment groups. In the placebo group, the geometric mean hsCRP (95% confidence interval (CI)) was 1.84 mg/l (95% CI: +1.70 to +2.00) at baseline and 1.98 mg/l (95% CI: 1.82 to 2.15) after 40 months (p < 0.0001). hsCRP levels were not affected by ALA (-5% versus placebo; 95% CI: -14% to +6%, p = 0.37), EPA-DHA (-8% versus placebo; 95% CI: -17% to +2%, p = 0.13), or EPA-DHA plus ALA (-3% versus placebo; 95% CI: -12% to +8%, p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS:
Long-term supplementation with modest amounts of EPA-DHA, whether or not in combination with ALA, did not affect hsCRP levels in patients with a history of myocardial infarction. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT00127452.


KEYWORDS:
alpha-linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, n-3 Fatty acids, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

PMID: 23774275 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]" --end copy

ANALYSIS: Many studies have shown positive results for omega 3 fatty acids on curbing inflammation. ref  While this study attempts to measure the anti-inflammatory abilities of omega 3 as EPA and DHA, the Scientists set up a very strange scenario. They used a large amount of margarine to carry these omega 3's into the body. This is like a fireman using gasoline to put out a fire. Margarines generally supply mostly omega 6 fatty acids which on breakdown in the body can generate inflammation if not enough omega 3 as EPA is present to balance this effect. (the margarine may also have contained trans-fats) So it is quite puzzling why such a little amount at 400 mg of omega 3 was tested while giving such a large dose at 19.8 grams of margarine which probably contains a significant amount of omega 6. The Scientists that conducted this study surely are not ignorant of the balance the body needs between omega 3 and omega 6 in controlling the inflammatory response? A healthy ratio is under 5 to 1, omega 6 to omega 3. ref This study used a 20-35 to 1 ratio, depending on if the margarine was low fat or not. Some Margarines today have added omega 3 in an attempt to overcome this unhealthy ratio. 

So the question that has to be asked; did they set out to fail?

Regarding the Scientists of this article, they conducted a similar study 2 years before this one and somehow arrived at a positive result. So it was logical to continue with another similar study. ref 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>